Fail-Safe Logic Selection — How to Choose Fail Open, Fail Close, or Fail Last

 







🔹Introduction

In oil & gas and petrochemical plants, every control valve, actuator, and safety device must respond correctly during a power failure, signal loss, or emergency shutdown.
Choosing whether a valve or actuator should fail open, fail close, or fail last can be the difference between a safe plant shutdown and a major accident.

This decision is part of fail-safe logic selection, one of the most critical engineering judgments made by an instrumentation design engineer.

This blog explains—step by step—what “fail-safe” really means, how to select the right fail position, and which standards guide the decision.


⚙️ 1. What Does “Fail-Safe” Mean in Instrumentation?

The term fail-safe means that when a system or device loses its power source, air supply, or control signal, it should move to a position that keeps the process safe.

A fail-safe valve automatically moves to its predefined safe position (open, close, or last) using spring return, stored energy, or mechanical design.

🧠 Simply put:
“Fail-safe means the equipment will fail in a way that minimizes risk to people, equipment, and the environment.”


🧩 2. Types of Fail-Safe Positions

There are three major fail positions used in industrial process control:

Fail PositionCommon TermTypical Action
Fail Close (FC)Air to OpenValve closes on air/power failure
Fail Open (FO)Air to CloseValve opens on air/power failure
Fail Last (FL)Lock-in-PlaceValve stays in last position on failure

🔧 3. Fail Close (FC) — When Safety Requires Isolation

Definition

A fail-close valve automatically moves to the closed position when the control signal or power supply is lost.

Typical Applications

  • Fuel gas to burners

  • Chemical feed lines

  • Steam to turbines

  • High-pressure feed to reactors

Logic:

When something goes wrong (loss of air, signal, or power), it is safer to stop the flow.

Example:

A fuel gas control valve to a fired heater should fail close during an emergency to prevent continuous gas flow and possible explosion.

Advantages

✅ Ensures containment of hazardous fluids
✅ Prevents equipment over-pressure
✅ Complies with safety regulations

Disadvantages

❌ May cause process upset if closure happens suddenly
❌ Requires system re-start procedure after trip


🔧 4. Fail Open (FO) — When Safety Requires Venting or Cooling

Definition

A fail-open valve automatically moves to the open position upon loss of signal or power.

Typical Applications

  • Cooling water supply to heat exchangers

  • Emergency relief lines

  • Vent valves for depressurization

  • Inlet air dampers for compressors

Logic:

When the safest condition is to release or continue flow, the valve must open on failure.

Example:

If a cooling water valve to a reactor closes accidentally, it could cause overheating.
Hence, it should fail open to maintain cooling even during emergencies.

Advantages

✅ Maintains critical cooling or venting
✅ Prevents over-heating or over-pressure
✅ Reduces risk of thermal runaway

Disadvantages

❌ Continuous flow may waste utilities or cause flooding
❌ Must ensure venting doesn’t release toxic gas directly


🔧 5. Fail Last (FL) — When the Process Must Hold Position

Definition

A fail-last (or fail-in-place) valve stays in its current position when the control signal or air supply is lost.

Typical Applications

  • Compressor suction valves

  • Reactor feed isolation in batch processes

  • Control valves in non-critical loops

Logic:

Used when both fail-open and fail-close conditions are unsafe.
In such cases, the valve remains in its last position until power is restored.

Example:

A valve controlling nitrogen purge might need to stay open during short signal losses but not fully close or open, making fail-last logic preferable.

Advantages

✅ Maintains stable process conditions
✅ Avoids unnecessary shutdowns
✅ Prevents pressure or flow shocks

Disadvantages

❌ Not recommended for critical safety functions
❌ Requires manual intervention after failure


🧠 6. How to Decide the Correct Fail Position

Choosing the fail-safe position is not guesswork—it follows a systematic safety logic.
Here’s a step-by-step approach:

StepKey QuestionDecision Logic
1What happens if flow stops?If stopping flow is safer → Fail Close
2What happens if flow continues?If continuing flow prevents damage → Fail Open
3Are both dangerous?If both are risky → Fail Last
4Is it part of ESD/SIS?Must follow SIL and HAZOP requirements
5Is it controlling safety-critical media (gas, steam, fuel)?Always design to fail to safe condition

Practical Example Table

ServiceTypical Fail ActionReason
Fuel gas to burnersFail ClosePrevent fire/explosion
Cooling water to reactorFail OpenPrevent overheating
Boiler feed waterFail OpenMaintain safe level
Steam to turbineFail ClosePrevent overspeed
Compressor anti-surge valveFail OpenPrevent surge
Instrument air headerFail LastMaintain control stability
Nitrogen purge lineFail LastMaintain inert atmosphere temporarily

📘 7. Relevant Standards and Guidelines

Fail-safe logic selection must align with recognized industry standards:

StandardDescription
ISA-75.05Control valve terminology and fail-safe definition
IEC 61508 / 61511Functional Safety (SIL requirements)
API RP 551Process Measurement & Control Guidelines
API RP 556Instrumentation for Fired Heaters
IEC 60079Electrical equipment in hazardous areas
ISO 4126Safety devices for protection against overpressure

These standards emphasize safety integrity, response time, and reliability when choosing fail-safe modes.


⚠️ 8. Common Mistakes in Fail-Safe Selection

  1. ❌ Selecting fail position based only on line function, not process safety.

  2. ❌ Ignoring the interaction between upstream and downstream valves.

  3. ❌ Forgetting to verify air failure direction in actuator specification.

  4. ❌ Overlooking fail position during HAZOP or SIL review.

  5. ❌ Assuming DCS logic alone ensures safety (it doesn’t—actuator design matters).


🔍 9. Field Verification Checklist

Before finalizing valve fail positions, always confirm:

  • ✅ Process data (pressure, temperature, medium, direction of flow)

  • ✅ Control valve data sheet (actuator type, spring return direction)

  • ✅ Safety study (HAZOP/SIL analysis outcome)

  • ✅ Cause & Effect (C&E) matrix consistency

  • ✅ Mechanical design of actuator (piston/spring configuration)


🧾 10. Conclusion

The fail-safe position of a valve or actuator is more than a mechanical feature—it’s a safety decision rooted in process logic and risk assessment.
Every instrumentation design engineer must justify the fail position based on the most probable failure scenario and its impact on plant safety.

Fail Close → For isolation or containment
Fail Open → For cooling, venting, or relief
Fail Last → For temporary stability where neither open nor close is safe

Choosing correctly prevents incidents, protects equipment, and saves lives.
Remember — in oil & gas, “fail-safe” truly means “fail to safety.”


Keywords:

Fail safe logic, fail open vs fail close, fail last valve, valve fail position, control valve safety, actuator fail safe direction, fail safe selection in instrumentation, ISA 75.05, IEC 61511 fail safe, oil and gas instrumentation safety.



Instrument Engineer

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post
WhatsApp Chat for Coaching
🌐 Translate